Atlantean Weapons Exposed In Spain?
The Nimrod Lens, a convex rock crystal artifact found in Nineveh, was presented by Sir David Brewster in the 19th century.
Nimrod Fortress, also called the "Castle of the Large Cliff," is located on Mount Hermon in the Golan Heights.
Artifacts like the Nimrod Lens, the crystal weapons in Spain, and Italy's polygonal masonry serve as evidence for this theory.
Defending the Book of Enoch and Explaining the Pre- and Post-Flood Nephilim
Skiba explores the genealogies of Noah’s sons and their descendants, noting that giants appeared in Canaan’s lineage (Amorites, Hittites) and possibly in the line of Cush (through Nimrod).
Moses said the post-Flood Nephilim came from other Nephilim
Cush, another son of Ham, is associated with Nimrod, who Skiba suggests altered himself to become like a Nephilim, rather than being born as one.
Nimrod, the Tower, the Beast, Antarctica and Flat Earth
Rob Skiba begins by discussing the period after the Great Flood, focusing on the character of Nimrod, whom he refers to as "the post-flood man of many names." He traces the genealogies and timelines of people from the post-flood era, including the overlapping lives of Nimrod and Abraham, which he interprets as a cosmic rivalry.
The discussion moves to the Tower of Babel, described in Genesis 11, where the people, under Nimrod's leadership, attempted to build a tower "whose top may reach unto heaven." Skiba addresses the widely held interpretation that the Tower of Babel was not about height but about spiritual rebellion, such as attempting to reach God or create a Stargate.
Nimrod, according to Skiba, became a central figure in various mythologies and religions, assuming names such as Gilgamesh, Osiris, Apollo, and Tammuz, among others.
Skiba asserts that these figures share similar characteristics, pointing to a shared origin in the figure of Nimrod.
Skiba offers a list of historical figures who had "Antichrist-like" characteristics, such as Nimrod, the Pharaoh of Egypt during the Exodus, and Antiochus Epiphanes.
Skiba proposes that the Antichrist is likely to be a resurrected Nimrod or a similar figure from ancient history.
Skiba discusses the significance of Antarctica in his cosmology, referencing historical expeditions such as Ernest Shackleton's 1908 Nimrod Expedition.
Skiba concludes by discussing the return of the Watchers and the possible return of Nimrod as the Antichrist, drawing from historical findings such as the tomb of Osiris and the discovery of the body of Gilgamesh in 2003.
The Tower of Babel and Confirming the Nimrod – Osiris – Orion – Apollo Connection
The discussion begins with Genesis 11, where the earth had one language, and the people gathered in the plains of Shinar under Nimrod's leadership.
After the scattering, Nimrod became known by many names across different cultures, including Gilgamesh, Baal, Osiris, and Apollo.
The origin of Nimrod
The Mighty Hunter named Nimrod receives a brief mention after the flood in Genesis 6-9 as a great-grandson of Noah, grandson of Ham.
In the case of Nimrod, leading experts in the world struggle to pinpoint his sources with certainty.
When one thinks of Nimrod today, it often evokes the image of a foolish or inept person.
Many have interpreted Nimrod's name as meaning "we will rebel," seeing it as an indicator that he is viewed negatively.
Instead, Nimrod stands as a successor to the warriors of old mentioned in Genesis 6:4.
Nimrod appears to have gone down in the Hall of Shame when he may have been understood by the Genesis authors as a hero figure contrasting with Cain.
Was Nimrod denigrated because he was a giant or Titan in this mythical prehistory?
It shouldn't be surprising if these god-kings played a role in influencing much later biblical traditions, such as that of Nimrod.
He states that Nimrod, the enigmatic figure mentioned briefly in Genesis 10 as a descendant of Noah, holds a compelling place in ancient texts.
Described as a mighty hunter before the Lord and considered the original king of Babylon, Nimrod's inclusion in the genealogical list bears a striking resemblance to the Sumerian Kings List from the Old Babylonian period.
Unraveling the identity of Nimrod has been a topic of much debate, with three main approaches explored:
Nimrod as a God: Some scholars propose that Nimrod was a god, possibly the Mesopotamian Ninurta or Marduk.
Nimrod as a Legendary Hero: Another approach suggests that Nimrod was a legendary Mesopotamian hero, potentially Gilgamesh, Lugalbanda, or even an eponym parallel to the Greek traditions of Ninos.
Nimrod as a Historical Figure: The third approach seeks to identify Nimrod with historical figures, including Sargon of Akkad, the first of Assyria, or even Egyptian pharaohs like Nemrutash or Aramaean rulers like Ben-Hadad.
The Hebrew rendering of Nimrod may stem from a Hebrew corruption and reinterpretation of divine names like Ninurta or Marduk.
One possible suggestion is that Nimrod is an abbreviation of a name formed with Ninurta or Marduk, similar to Tukulti-Ninurta I.
Upon closer examination, the biblical portrayal of Nimrod draws upon multiple Mesopotamian traditions.
Nimrod's rule over Assyria reflects the long-standing cultural superiority of Babylonia over Assyria, pointing to a period before 2000 BC under the Akkadian or Ur III dynasties, or around 610 to 539 BC during the Neo-Babylonian Chaldean rule.
Moreover, the association of Cush, Nimrod's father, with the Kassites and the mention of Shinar possibly reflecting Shanghara—a designation of Kassite Babylonia—indicates the utilization of Babylonian traditions originating in the later second millennium BC.
Assyria also plays a role in the biblical depiction of Nimrod, particularly during the Neo-Assyrian period from the 9th to 7th centuries BC when Assyria dominated Babylonia.
This connection is evident in Micah's identification of the land of Nimrod with Assyria.
While the diverse traditions surrounding Nimrod make it difficult to pinpoint one specific individual he represents, it is clear that he functions as a legendary and composite eponym of Mesopotamia.
The parallels between Mesopotamian god Ninurta and Nimrod in Genesis are somewhat speculative, but several scholars think the connection is strong enough.
Let's explore the fascinating connection between Ninurta and Nimrod.
Many scholars believe that Ninurta served as the inspiration for the biblical figure Nimrod mentioned in Genesis 10:8-12 as a mighty hunter.
While the exact transformation of the name Ninurta into Nimrod in Hebrew remains somewhat elusive, the two figures share similar functions and attributes, making Ninurta the most plausible etymology for Nimrod.
Specifically, in 2 Kings 19:37 and Isaiah 37:38, King Sennacherib of Assyria is said to have been assassinated by his sons Adrammelech and Sharezer in the temple of Nisroch, which is likely a scribal error for Nimrod.
Although the Book of Genesis portrays Nimrod favorably as the first post-flood king and builder of cities, the Greek Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Bible presents him as a giant and mistranslates the Hebrew phrase meaning "before Yahweh" as "in opposition against God." Consequently, Nimrod became associated with idolatry, embodying the archetypal idolater.
Early Jewish Midrash works, as described by the philosopher Philo in his Questiones, depict Nimrod as the instigator of the Tower of Babel and persecutor of the Jewish patriarch Abraham for his refusal to participate in the project.
Saint Augustine of Hippo refers to Nimrod as a deceiver, oppressor, and destroyer of earthborn creatures in his book The City of God.
The parallels between the Mesopotamian god Ninurta and Nimrod in Genesis are somewhat speculative, but several scholars think the connection is strong enough.
Ninurta is a powerful god of war and hunting in Mesopotamian mythology, while Nimrod is described as a mighty hunter in Genesis.
several cities, including Nippur, while Nimrod is associated with the founding of cities like Babylon and Uruk in the biblical narrative.
Similarly, Nimrod is described as a descendant of Ham, one of Noah's sons in Genesis.
Could this overlap with the mighty hunter Nimrod?
Ninas is not attested in any of the extensive king lists compiled by the Mesopotamians themselves, nor mentioned in any Mesopotamian literature, and it is possible that this Hellenic creation was inspired by the deeds of one or more real kings of Assyria or Assyro-Babylonian mythology, just like Nimrod.
Similarly, the biblical character of Nimrod is not attested anywhere in Assyrian, Babylonian, Akkadian, or Sumerian literature or kings lists but is believed by many scholars to have been inspired by one or more real kings.
In what follows, you're going to find Nimrod parallels but also a case made by Gmirkin suggesting that Genesis authors made use of Berossus, putting its final composition in the Hellenistic period.
Gmirkin delves into the fascinating character of Nimrod and sheds light on the topic of Genesis composition.
Spicer's theory, there are indeed noteworthy similarities between Ninus and Nimrod despite the flaws in Spicer's argument.
It becomes evident that the Nimrod story in Genesis incorporates elements from the Ninus legend as documented by Ctesias in his Persica.
In these legends, Ninus and Nimrod were both ancient kings of Mesopotamia, ruling over Assyria and Babylonia and linked to the establishment of Nineveh.
In contrast, Genesis portrays Nimrod as a Babylonian king who holds authority over both Babylon and Assyria.
The source of the Nimrod story can be traced to Berossus, who challenged Ctesias's depiction of Mesopotamian history.
Interestingly, the Genesis narrative echoes Berossus's perspective by presenting Nimrod as the founder of Babylon before establishing Nineveh.
Berossus's work, the Babylonica, aligns closely with the Nimrod story and its pro-Babylonian standpoint.
The accurate depiction of Babylonian and Assyrian cities in the Nimrod accounts aligns with Berossus's expertise in Mesopotamian geography.
Consequently, it is plausible that Berossus serves as the source for the Nimrod story in Genesis, reflecting his polemics against the Ninus legend and Ctesias's account.
To sum it up, Ninus and Nimrod represent competing traditions aiming to establish the pedigree of Assyria and Babylon.
There are several parallels between Gilgamesh and Nimrod.
Gilgamesh is described as a powerful and fearless warrior in the Epic of Gilgamesh, while Nimrod is portrayed as a mighty hunter in Genesis.
Similarly, Nimrod is associated with the giants and is described as a descendant of Ham, one of Noah's sons.
Gilgamesh and Nimrod are known for their hunting prowess.
Similarly, Nimrod is renowned for his hunting skills and is celebrated as a mighty hunter in Genesis.
Both figures are associated with the founding of great cities—Gilgamesh with Uruk and Nimrod with Babylon and Uruk.
Gilgamesh is depicted as a king ruling in the aftermath of the flood, and Nimrod is portrayed as a prominent figure in the generation following the deluge.
Here are some other plausible antecedents to the Nimrod stories that have been proposed by scholars throughout history.
Makar: A legendary figure from Sumerian mythology presents intriguing parallels that make him a plausible antecedent to Nimrod.
Both Makar and Nimrod are depicted as powerful rulers associated with the city of Uruk, known for their ambitious construction projects and their role as builders of cities and temples.
Makar, like Nimrod, exemplifies the archetype of a great leader and the founder of civilization, attributed with establishing the foundations of a prosperous society.
The similarities in their roles as influential kings and builders, along with their association with the city of Uruk, suggest a potential connection between Makar and Nimrod.
Asher: The eponymous founder of the Assyrian Empire presents a compelling case as a potential antecedent to Nimrod.
Both Asher and Nimrod are associated with the region of Mesopotamia and hold prominent roles in the establishment of powerful kingdoms.
Similarly, Nimrod is portrayed as a powerful ruler who establishes dominion over Babylon and Assyria.
The link between Asher and Nimrod is further strengthened by their shared association with Nineveh, as both figures are connected to the founding or development of this significant city.
Hercules: The legendary hero of Greek mythology presents an interesting possibility as an antecedent to the character of Nimrod, especially if you factor in Gmirkin's later dating of the composition of the Pentateuch.
Both Hercules and Nimrod are renowned for their exceptional strength and prowess as mighty warriors and hunters.
Both figures enjoy a significant degree of divine ancestry, with Hercules being the son of Zeus, the king of the gods, and Nimrod being associated with the gods as a mighty hunter.
The parallel between Hercules and Nimrod extends to their roles as founders of influential cities or civilizations.
Hercules is attributed with the establishment of numerous cities, while Nimrod is connected with the founding of Babylon and Nineveh.
Sargon: The legendary ruler of the Akkadian Empire in ancient Mesopotamia presents a compelling case as a potential antecedent to Nimrod.
Both Sargon and Nimrod are depicted as powerful and influential leaders who played significant roles in the foundation and expansion of their respective kingdoms.
Sargon is renowned for his military conquests and the establishment of the first empire in history, while Nimrod is associated with the founding of Babylon and Nineveh, two prominent cities in ancient Mesopotamia.
Additionally, Sargon and Nimrod both possess narratives that blur the lines between historical and mythical elements, with legends and embellishments surrounding their lives and accomplishments.
The parallels between Sargon and Nimrod suggest the possibility of shared cultural influences or archetypal motifs in the ancient Near East, where stories and legends could be adapted and reimagined over time.
Their accomplishments and conquests, as well as their roles in the foundation and expansion of cities and empires, bear resemblances to the legendary attributes associated with Nimrod.
It is plausible that over time, the historical accounts of these rulers became intertwined with mythical and legendary elements, leading to the creation of larger-than-life figures like Nimrod.
Our history – A Shemitic Myth
That was the figure of the sun; precisely such as had before been found amidst the ruins of Nineveh and Memphis, Tanta and Heliopolis; and consequently it spoke, not merely of four thousand five hundred, or five thousand years ago, but it speaks of the early days of the Chaldean empire; of commerce and art; and hints, not merely at the Jebusite reign, but of Ninus and of Nimrod.
Kush, Cuniform and the Medu Neter
Nimrod, the son of Cush, founded Sumer.
Noah’s offspring
[1] Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.[2] The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.[3] And the sons of Gomer; Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.[4] And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.[5] By these were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.[6] And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan.[7] And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtecha: and the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.[8] And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.[9] He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD.[10] And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.[11] Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah,[12] And Resen between Nineveh and Calah: the same is a great city.[13] And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim,[14] And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (out of whom came Philistim,) and Caphtorim.[15] And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth,[16] And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite,[17] And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,[18] And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad.[19] And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha.[20] These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.[21] Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children born.[22] The children of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram.[23] And the children of Aram; Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Mash.[24] And Arphaxad begat Salah; and Salah begat Eber.[25] And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother's name was Joktan.[26] And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazar-maveth, and Jerah,[27] And Hadoram, and Uzal, and Diklah,[28] And Obal, and Abimael, and Sheba,[29] And Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab: all these were the sons of Joktan.[30] And their dwelling was from Mesha, as thou goest unto Sephar a mount of the east.[31] These are the sons of Shem, after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, after their nations.[32] These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.
Noah and The flood
In his History of Armenia, he wrote that Noah and his family first settled in Armenia and later moved to Babylon. Hayk, a descendant of Japheth, a son of Noah, revolted against Bel (the biblical Nimrod) and returned to the area around Mount Ararat, where he established the roots of the Armenian nation.