Wes Huff

Why Do Catholics and Protestants Have Different Books in Their Bibles?

Youtube video

Introduction

The video discusses the differences in the number of books found in Catholic and Protestant Bibles, outlining historical, theological, and cultural reasons behind these variations. It clarifies misconceptions and provides an overview of the historical development of the biblical canon.


Differences in the Number of Books

  • Protestant Bible: Contains 39 books in the Old Testament.
  • Catholic Bible: Contains 46 books in the Old Testament, with additional portions in books like Daniel and Esther.

The Catholic canon includes seven additional books and is commonly referred to as the Deuterocanonical Books or Second Canon. Protestants refer to these books as the Apocrypha.


Jewish Canon

The Hebrew Bible used by modern Jews contains the same books as the Protestant Old Testament, although organized differently.


Misconceptions

Two prevalent but inaccurate ideas are addressed:

  1. That Protestants removed agreed-upon books during the Reformation.
  2. That Catholics added these books as a response to Protestant reforms.

Development of the Biblical Canon

  • The term “Bible” originates from the Greek word Biblos, meaning “books,” emphasizing that the Bible is a collection of texts.
  • Early Christians valued and produced many writings, including those later considered Deuterocanonical.

Early Church Perspectives

  • There was broad agreement on the 66 books found in modern Protestant and Catholic Bibles.
  • Disputes revolved around the other books.

Jewish Perspective

  • Ancient Jews considered the additional books valuable but did not view them as divinely inspired scripture.

Early Christian Writers

  • Figures such as Melito of Sardis, Origen, and Athanasius argued for excluding most Deuterocanonical books based on their interpretation of Paul’s statement in Romans 3:2.
  • In the Latin West, some leaders like Augustine and Innocent I accepted these books due to their use in early Christian communities, while others, including Jerome and Rufinus, placed them in a secondary category.

Medieval and Reformation Developments

  • In 1445, the Council of Florence included the Deuterocanonical books in its Old Testament list, but this was not considered binding dogma.
  • During the Reformation, debates continued about the inclusion of these books. Prominent figures such as Erasmus and Cardinal Cajetan sided with the narrower Jewish canon.

Council of Trent

  • In 1546, the Council of Trent affirmed the Deuterocanonical books as part of the canon, aligning with the Council of Florence.
  • Protestants, however, maintained their adherence to the Hebrew canon, rejecting the Deuterocanonical books as divinely inspired.

Terminology

  • Deuterocanonical: A term coined in 1566 by Sixtus of Siena to describe these books as secondary in reception, not authority.
  • Apocrypha: A Protestant term meaning “hidden,” distinguishing these books from the canonical scriptures.

Protestant and Catholic Positions

  • Catholic doctrine, including beliefs about purgatory and prayer for the dead, found support in Deuterocanonical books.
  • Protestant reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin rejected these doctrines, emphasizing the 66 books of the Hebrew canon.

Concluding Points

  1. The Deuterocanonical books provide historical and cultural insights into the period leading up to Jesus but are not considered scripture in the Protestant tradition.
  2. The Protestant stance on the biblical canon aligns more closely with ancient Jewish practices.

Understanding the history behind the biblical canon helps clarify misconceptions and fosters informed discussions.

For further exploration of related topics, viewers are encouraged to explore additional content on the channel.

Leave a Comment