Graham Hancock on a troubled archaeologyGraham HancockvideoGraham HancockVideosVideos.

Graham Hancock on a troubled archaeology

Talking with DeDunking, Graham Hancock argues that professional archaeology has turned sour. On Easter Island he treats a late Polynesian landfall as the textbook view, then asks whether a unique script and memories of a flood and a drowned homeland reach further back. A food plant that cannot float from isle to isle had to be carried, he says, and the great stone figures cannot be dated, only the platforms under them. He wants survivor stories respected and says the scholarship has been shut tight. He describes a major American society pushing retractions and pile ons, and he reads envy in a circle of online critics. He rejects the charge that his books manufacture racial supremacy. At Giza he defends setting three large pyramids beside the belt stars. The match may be wrong, he allows, but it should not be caricatured. He treats a famous open encyclopedia as tainted, and he points to older American sites and a Pacific genetic echo as reasons a single late migration fails. These are his claims about the field.

Key points

  • Hancock questions a short chronology for Easter Island and cites carried crops, undatable statues, and local flood memory.
  • He says the island’s oral account of survivors deserves respect and that scholarship there has been closed.
  • He accuses a professional society and online critics of organizing personal attacks and retractions.
  • He denies that his work is a racial project and calls that accusation an abuse of position.
  • The Orion comparison at Giza, he says, can be mistaken without deserving mockery.
  • On the Americas he argues against a single late migration, using sites, Pacific genes, and missing point types.

Topics on this site

Short quotes

they can't migrate magically from Island to Island they have to be brought by people

Graham Hancock, Graham Hancock on a troubled archaeology
Graham Hancock, Graham Hancock on a troubled archaeology

He uses a food plant that cannot seed itself across open water as proof that sailors carried it. Watch at 6:28

the statues themselves cannot be dated

Graham Hancock, Graham Hancock on a troubled archaeology
Graham Hancock, Graham Hancock on a troubled archaeology

Stone figures, he argues, do not yield a date, so the platforms beneath them are a later chapter. Watch at 9:38

we may be wrong but it doesn't deserve to be smeared

Graham Hancock, Graham Hancock on a troubled archaeology
Graham Hancock, Graham Hancock on a troubled archaeology

On the pyramid comparison he allows error and objects to ridicule in place of an argument. Watch at 48:37

Video by DeDunking. Watch on YouTube.